Microsoft

Linguistic Analysis API

Welcome to the Linguistic Analysis API Forum

Categories

API – Any ideas or feedback pertaining to features or enhancements to Linguistic Analysis API.

Documentation – Any ideas or suggestions for the API Reference or Documentation.

Language Support – Submit a request to have a particular language supported.

Samples & SDK Request – Let us know if you would like to see a Code sample or SDK provided.

  1. Where is the linguistics API???

    It's exactly what i need and i can't find it anywhere...

    4 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  2. Very disappointed of Microsoft's decision to remove this API

    The bulk of Cognitive Services are prototypes, that are not very useful beyond "hello world". The one service that I was counting on to is the Linguistics Analytics API. I am very disappointed of the recent announced that it will be discontinued.

    6 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  3. Provide Linguistic Analysis API Keys

    My 30 day trial is expired. There is no way to renew that I can see, there is no option to subscribe in Azure.

    For now I'm using Google Natural Language (which does provide some lemmas - not as good as Office NLP but OK).

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  4. Linguistic Analysis API doesn't support many languages. I am looking for Portuguese language.

    Linguistic Analysis API doesn't support many languages. I am looking for Portuguese language.
    Could you please help me in getting this support.

    Thanks,
    Pankaj

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Under Review  ·  0 comments  ·  Language Support  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  5. Analysed text does not get displayed

    Hi,
    I found a bug when I try the following text : I'm working in Innovalus

    But the POS Tags and Tokens are getting extracted.
    (TOP (S (NP (PRP I)) (VP (VBP 'm) (VP (VBG working) (PP (IN in) (NP (NNP Innovalus)))))))

    [I'm] text is not handled, but when I expand it to [I am] it is working fine.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. Combine the tag with the token side by side in the results

    Hi,

    Currently, it isn't easy to parse the results. Fetching this:

    (TOP (SBARQ (WHADVP (WRB How)) (SQ (VP (VBP are)) (NP (PRP you)) (NN today) (. ?))))

    requires a lot of string manipulation. In a scenario where you'd want to keep only the verbs, you'd have a lot of work. Why not doing something similar as what Stanford does? So, in the results, we'd have the tokens and their corresponding tag side by side like this for instance:
    {
    "Len": 5,
    "NormalizedToken": "Hello",
    "Offset": 16,
    "RawToken": "Hello",
    "Tag":"UH"
    }

    that'd make it easier to extract only tags you're interested in…

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. Complete Swagger specification

    The Swagger spec for the API is incomplete. It is missing response definitions for each of the operations available.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    0 comments  ·  API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  8. Emphasize the indication of a Demo on Linguistic Analysis demo page

    On the Linguistic analysis page, there is a cool demo, but it isn't clear that there is a demo. A button or something that says "analyze" would be very helpful!

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    Resolved  ·  0 comments  ·  API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. Linguistics Analysis: correct categorization of speech disfluency

    Currently, speech parts such as "um" and "like" appear to be categorized as nouns or adverbs (depending on context). It would be great to detect these speech disfluencies. I have an idea for an app to help with feedback for public speaking.

    1 vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    2 comments  ·  API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  10. Lemma detail in token result

    It would be nice if linguistic api token result includes lemma for the word.

    Part of speech with it even better. (to catch the standard with other NLP libraries.

    2 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    1 comment  ·  API  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  • Don't see your idea?

Linguistic Analysis API

Feedback and Knowledge Base